How this
page is made
Near the end of
a programme every student is asked once, in writing, to say how
it went. Whatever comes back goes into our review feed as it is
— no editing for tone, no trimming of the awkward line, no
rewrite by the marketing side. Nothing is offered in exchange:
no discount, no gift, no certificate held back until a review
appears. Eleven of the students on this page agreed to have
their name and locality published, so those eleven carry both;
the remaining forty-seven appear under their own review title
with no name, because inventing one would be worse than leaving
it blank. Grouping the reviews by course family is our editorial
reading of what each person described, and where a review does
not name its course we have linked the hub page rather than
guess a specific one. The rating we publish, 4.9 out of 5 across
180 reviews, is the same figure carried in this site’s
structured data — not rounded up, and not padded with unrated
feedback. If any of that ever stops being true, this paragraph
is the first thing that should change.